THE PARK TOURS NATURE PEOPLE VISIT US

Logo Parco Nazionale Dolomiti Bellunesi

home

 

Park Authority
Planning
Projects
Fossil Free
Recovering mountain pastures
Studies & research
Boundaries
FAQ

The Park » Activities and projects

The Belluno Dolomites National Park "Animals" Special Project

The project

The Belluno Dolomites National Park (PNDB) occupies the southernmost part of the Dolomites between the Cismon and Piave torrents. With its 31,512 hectares, it represents one of the best preserved mountain areas in the eastern Alps with an exceptionally high level of plant biodiversity. With the exception of the steinbock, it is also home to all the typical Alpine vertebrates.
The Park Plan (published in the Extraordinary Supplement of the Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 21 of 26-01-2001) defines strategies and criteria for managing and conserving the ecosystems and biocenoses, but delegates detailed definition of the activities to be carried out in the various sectors falling within the competency of the Park Authority to a series of "special projects", including a number dedicated to animals.
The Animals Special Project (ASP) is a "Conservation Plan" aimed at analysing the interactions between animals and habitat and identifying measures to "conserve" the zoocenosis. The ASP therefore provides operational support to the Park Authority in planning future wildlife strategies.

Objectives

The Project's objectives are:

  1. to critically assess the state of available knowledge about wildlife in the Park area;
  2. to enter all available information in a Geographical Information System;
  3. to make operational conservation, study and research proposals;
  4. to define action priorities.

The conservation proposals have been drawn up with the aim of maximising all the possible benefits deriving from the presence of animals and have been chosen not just for their ecological validity, but also for their compatibility with the environmental and social situation in the area.
The benefits deriving from animals in a protected area can be divided into three categories: ecological, economic and aesthetic (Table 1)


Table 1: Benefits relating to the presence of animals
Ecological: relating to the stability of the natural ecosystems The importance of the animal species over and above the value attributed them by man
Economic: relating to the financial spin-off deriving from wildlife related activities Cultural and recreational fruition of the animal species
Aesthetic: relating to the importance man attributes to the mere presence of the animals, while not utilising them directly The inner satisfaction man feels observing the animals, even if completely casually, or simply being aware of their presence

The projects and activities proposed all take into consideration the fact that the Park must be interpreted in a wider geographical context with important environmental (ecological) and human (socioeconomic) relationships. This type of approach was adopted in the awareness that each action planned or proposed must necessarily take account of a whole series of not exclusively scientific factors which, if neglected, would make all efforts fruitless or even counterproductive. In particular, when planning wildlife strategies, account must be taken not just of the basic legislative priorities, but also of the legitimate expectations of those living and working in the area, never forgetting that in the case of a National Park wildlife management must necessarily give priority to conservation and cultural aspects associated with indirect use of the animal populations.
This is one of the reasons why the Animals Special Project is based on a "holistic approach" aimed at considering not just the most "socially interesting" species (ungulates and galliformes), but also the entire zoocenosis as far as possible.
The following taxa were considered: invertebrates (certain systematic groups only), bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, nesting birds (with particular reference to the alpine galliformes) and mammals (with particular reference to the ungulates and considering rodents and insectivores at mapping level only).
This type of approach enables the Park area to be characterised with respect to areas outside the boundaries.
The complexity of such a task necessitated the setting up of a large working group in order to ensure the availability of all the expertise required. (Table 2).


Table 2: The Animals Special Project working group.
Marco Apollonio - Department of Zoology and Biological Anthropology - University of Sassari Scientific manager and special sections on the wolf
Andrea Mustoni Technical orientation and special sections on the bear, steinbock and fox
Barbara Chiarenzi - Oikos Institute - Varese Technical orientation and editing, special sections on the bear, steinbock and fox
Sandro Ruffo and Beatrice Sambugar Special sections on invertebrates
Enrico Marconato - Aquaprogram s.r.l. Special sections on fish
Andrea Dall'Asta Special sections on amphibians, reptiles and medium-sized carnivores
Michele Cassol Special sections on birds (except galliformes), amphibians, reptiles and medium-sized carnivores
Paolo and Giacomo De Franceschi Special sections on alpine galliformes
Maurizio Ramanzin - Department of Animal Sciences at Padua University Special sections on ungulates
Marco Catello Special sections on the lynx
Pier Giuseppe Meneguz and Luca Rossi - Department of Animal Production, Epidemiology and Ecology, Turin University Special sections on health aspects
Simonetta Fuser, Mara Maffei In charge of the G.I.S. section
Enrico Vettorazzo - Belluno Dolomites National Park Contact for the Belluno Dolomites National Park
Gianpiero Andreatta - Local Coordination Centre for the Environment, State Forestry Corps Contact for the State Forestry Corps

Results
Wildlife analysis
The numerous research projects carried out during recent years by the Park have enabled a relatively detailed picture of the species present in the area to be drawn up. Further studies are, however, necessary, in particular for the invertebrates of which only 446 species have been surveyed to date (Table 3). Endemic species of hypogean fauna and Rosalia alpine, a Cerambycidae beetle listed in Annex II of EC 92/43, the Habitat Directive, are particularly important.


Table 3: Summary of invertebrates surveyed in the BDNP
Phylum Class Order Total
Annelida Oligochaeta 4
Arthropoda Arachnida Acarina 11
Crustacea Copepoda 14
Ostracoda 2
Hexapoda (Insects) Amphipoda 1
Coleoptera 87
Diptera 31
Ephemeroptera 6
Lepidoptera 95
Plecoptera 20
Trichoptera 19
Mollusca Gastropoda 9
Other Mollusca 147
Total 446

The survey included 204 species of vertebrate, but the various groups were studied at different depths. For mammals, ungulates and carnivores, birds and bony fish, all species present have probably been identified, but this is not the case for insectivores, rodents and bats for which further study is required (Table 4).


Table 4. Summary of vertebrates surveyed in the BDNP
Class Order Total
Osteichthyes (fish) Cypriniformes 3

Salmoniformes 3

Scorpaeniformes 1

Total fish 7
Amphibians Anura 7

Urodela 5

Total amphibians 12
Reptiles Squamata 13

Total reptiles 13
Birds Accipitriformes 10

Anseriformes 4

Apodiformes 2

Caprimulgiformes 1

Charadriiformes 6

Ciconiiformes 3

Columbiformes 3

Coraciiformes 2

Cuculiformes 1

Falconiformes 4

Galliformes 6

Gruiformes 2

Passeriformes 80

Pelecaniformes 1

Piciformes 5

Podecipediformes 2

Strigiformes 8

Total birds 140
Mammals Carnivora 10

Chiroptera 2

Insectivora 5

Lagomorpha 2

Rodentia 7

Artiodactyla 6

Total mammals 32
Total
204

The Park can boast the presence of a number of particularly important animal species such as, among the fish, the bleak (Alburnus alburnus alborella), marble trout (Salmo (trutta) marmoratus) and European bullhead (Cottus gobio), the last two listed in Annex II of the Habitat Directive.
Amphibians are represented by the most typical mountain species including the great crested newt (Triturus carnifex) and yellow-bellied toad (Bombina variegata) listed in Annex II of the Habitat Directive. The 13 species of reptile include the viviparous lizard (Zootoca vivipara), Horvath's rock lizard (Iberolacerta horvathi) the common adder (Vipera berus) and also the horned viper (Vipera ammodytes), listed in Annex IV of the Habitat Directive.
The 140 species of birds surveyed include the occasional presence of both the bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) and griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus), both listed in Annex I of Directive 79/409/EEC, the Birds Directive, while a number of species such as the golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), corn crake (Crex crex) (listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive and considered as "vulnerable" by the IUCN) and capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) are present in the Park with significant populations.
Conservation and management proposals
The proposed measures can be divided into four types:
Environmental improvement (EI): includes all activities involving the habitat, such as grass cutting or thinning in areas identified by experts as fundamental for the species involved.
Basic surveys (S): regular surveys to monitor populations (censuses, health monitoring, etc).
Active species management (M): reintroduction, eradication, etc.
Research (R): research in the literal sense and other activities aimed at improving knowledge of Park wildlife.
A priority was attributed to each activity (maximum, high, medium) to enable the Park to plan allocation of the available financial resources. The problem of defining an "Emergency Indicator" considering both ecological and social factors to assign to the various species is not new in wildlife planning. The group's work to this end is summed up in Table 5.


Table 5. Criteria for identifying wildlife emergencies in the Park
Definition of priorities is fundamental in order to optimise wildlife conservation initiatives. However, the task has become increasingly difficult, subject to personal interpretation and therefore criticism. It is, in fact, extremely difficult to objectively quantify the series of ecological, biological and social parameters which contribute to making a species "deserving of particular attention".
In trying to achieve uniformity (between taxa) and objectively determine the "Importance" of the species in the Animals Special Project as far as possible, a number of criteria summing up the characteristics of the populations were considered.
A score was given to each criterion and the sum of the scores for the various criteria was used to draw up a classification identifying the species on which to concentrate planning and operational efforts. It must be emphasised that the significance of the classification thus obtained is purely comparative and has no absolute value.
The table below lists the criteria used and their score.
Criterion Description Score
1. Geographical distribution Examines the distribution of the species and the size of the population in terms of numbers of elements. This attributed greater numerical importance to those species which seemed more closely linked to local habitats than to more common species. 5 = Endemic species
4 = Species rare in the province (as well as being rare at Italian level, it is also rare in the province)
3 = Species rare in Italy (as well as being particularly rare in Europe, it is also rare in Italy)
2 = Species rare in Europe (present throughout Europe but with patchy populations)
1 = Species common in Europe (present consistently throughout the continent)
2. Population dynamics This parameter considers the trend in numbers of individual species at European level. Above and beyond their rarity, a high value was attributed to those species whose numbers are dropping, compared with those in constant expansion which from a certain point of view needed less attention. Translating this concept into numbers, the classes alongside were obtained. 4 = Species in generalised decline (numbers dropping everywhere in Europe).
3 = Species in decline in Italy (stable in Europe but in decline in Italy).
2 = Species in decline in the province (stable in Italy and Europe but in decline in the province).
1 = Species stationary in Europe (numerically stable throughout the European continent).
0 = Species on the increase in Europe (numbers increasing throughout Europe).

It is not possible to describe all the conservation and management measures proposed. Table 6 provides a summary.

Species Action type Action Priority Operating criteria
Marble trout G Reduction of competition with the brown trout Maximum Collection by electrofishing
European bullhead G Reduction of competition with salmonids Medium Collection by electrofishing
Marble trout G Reduction of competition with allochthonous species (rainbow trout and Arctic char) Medium Collection by electrofishing
Marble trout G Protection of selected local material and repopulation of marble trout Maximum Production of genetically controlled material
Marble trout G Regulation of marble trout fishing. Maximum
European bullhead G Repopulation High Collection of fish from nearby water bodies, introduction and monitoring
Grayling G Repopulation of the grayling High Collection of fish from nearby water bodies, marking, introduction and monitoring
Birds G Protection of nesting sites High Compensation for felling loss, costs for moving footpaths, ...
Ungulates G Training of Forestry Corps personnel and others with a convention with the Park (see Employment Plan) Maximum Refresher courses, presentation of the results of monitoring by external managers
Wild boar G Feasibility study and possible control of any groups of wild boar identified Maximum Control of groups present
Steinbock G Reintroduction Medium Def. of health situation; def. of operational plan in implementation of the release project. Monitoring of new colonies.
Bear, wolf G Development of the knowledge and awareness of personnel working in the area (wardens, etc) with regard to the ecology and distribution of the species Medium Targeted courses and participation in conferences and meetings on the theme
Bear, wolf G Information campaigns aimed at the local population and tourists. Medium Themed evenings, debates, leaflets, etc.
Bear, wolf G Congruence between conservation criteria and population management Medium Liaison with authorities and associations involved in conservation of the bear and the great predators
Bear, wolf (lynx) G Modification of livestock farming practices Medium Liaison with farmers' associations
Lynx G Information material High Leaflets, booklets, etc.
Lynx G Training and information courses Maximum Meetings with the local population and wardens
Lynx G Schools project Medium Meetings with schools
Lynx G Travelling exhibition Medium Photographs and posters on the biology of the lynx
Lynx G Gadgets Medium
Marble trout, European bullhead, grayling M Annual monitoring High Direct sampling in predefined sites
Amphibians M Updating of the Park's Atlas of Amphibians Medium Updating of the Atlas
Reptiles M Updating of the Park's Atlas of Reptiles Medium Updating of the Atlas
Birds, rare species M Collection of notifications of rare species or occasional sightings in the Park Medium Delegated to Forestry Corps personnel and volunteers
Birds, nesting M Updating of the Atlas of Nesting Birds High
Corn crake M Monitoring of the corn crake population High Partly delegated to Forestry Corps personnel
Capercaillie M Monitoring of the capercaillie population

Black grouse M Monitoring of the black grouse population

Ptarmigan M Monitoring of the ptarmigan population

Rock partridge M Monitoring of the rock partridge population

Hazel grouse M Monitoring of the hazel grouse population

Ungulates M General monitoring Maximum Adaptation of the Forestry Corps data archiving system, planning of Forestry Corps surveys, data processing and link with the Park GIS
Roe deer M Assessment of indicators of abundance for roe deer in the Park's various environments High Spring censuses on sample routes and areas and/or kilometric indicators of abundance, to be used as trend indicators
Red deer M Monitoring of roars and indicators of abundance Maximum Integrated in part with general monitoring. In addition, spring spotlight censuses in collaboration with neighbouring provinces, visual censuses in sample areas and/or kilometric indicators of abundance, inventory of roar areas
Chamois M Monitoring of population trends of the chamois in the Park Maximum Continuation of censuses in the three sample areas already defined. Integration in general monitoring and coordination with the Province of Belluno and Trento for neighbouring areas
Mouflon M Monitoring of the evolution of numbers and distribution of mouflon in the Park Maximum Survey of summer grazing areas to estimate the size of the group. Integration in general monitoring and coordination with the province of Belluno for monitoring of distribution and population limiting factors
Wild boar M Monitoring of signs of the presence of wild boar Maximum Monitoring of signs of presence Staff training
Mustelids M Verification of the presence of mustelids in the Park area High Direct and indirect indicators of presence.
Fox M Geographical distribution and relative density of the fox Medium Standard transepts repeated over the years
Fox M Analysis of the state of health of the fox Medium
Lynx M Basic monitoring High Basic monitoring at least during the winter months
Brown hare, mountain hare M Basic monitoring/censuses High Delegated to Forestry Corps personnel and/or volunteers coordinated by an expert
Chiroptera M Definition of the specific presence and location of bat colonies in the Park High
Chamois M Monitoring of mange

Animal husbandry M Monitoring of domestic ruminants

All M Passive health monitoring

All M Zoonosis monitoring

Marble trout MA Renaturalisation of environments where the marble trout was originally present High Creation of fish corridors
Grayling MA Environmental improvement High Creation of fish corridors
European bullhead MA Minimal vital flow for the European bullhead Medium Minimum vital flow
European bullhead MA Improvement of water quality for the European bullhead Medium Improvement of water quality
Amphibians MA Restoration and safeguarding of ponds and troughs High Sealing and restoration of the main bodies of still water present in the Park
Birds MA Maintenance of grassland and farmland habitats Maximum Synergic action with vegetation, landscape and agricultural objectives
Birds MA Improvement of aquatic habitats along the Cordevole Medium Synergic action with fish and environmental objectives in general
Black grouse MA Restoration of habitats; management plan Maximum Definitive localisation of suitable habitats for the improvements; forestry management measures;
Rock partridge MA Restoration of high altitude habitats; management plan High Definitive localisation of habitats frequented by the species; cleaning, thinning of scrubland; management plan.
Capercaillie MA Restoration of mixed woodland habitats; thinning; management plan Maximum Definitive localisation of suitable habitats; forestry management measures;
Ptarmigan MA Management plan; studies with collection of meteorological data; predation and nomadism High Definitive localisation of habitats; identification of causes of impact; proposals for mitigation; integrated management of tourism and other human activities
Hazel grouse MA Restoration of forest habitats through thinning Medium Definitive localisation of the habitats frequented by the species; Restoration of currently deteriorating habitats with scrub clearance, thinning and cleaning of the woods.
Lynx MA Wildlife corridors Maximum Identification and improvement of wildlife corridors
Brown hare, mountain hare MA Maintenance of grassland habitats Maximum Synergic action with vegetation, landscape and agricultural objectives
Chiroptera MA Environmental improvement Medium
Hypogean invertebrates R Research on the fauna inhabiting underground acquatic environments to identify endemic, rare or vulnerable species Maximum
Troglobitic invetebrates R Completion of studies on the troglobitic fauna in the Park with particular regard to endemic and rare species Maximum
Invertebrates, Coleoptera R Study of Coleoptera inhabiting rockfall debris High
Invertebrates, Orthoptera R Survey of Orthopteroidea High
Invertebrates, Molluscs R Research on molluscs High
Marble trout R Study of marble trout populations in the Mis and Stua lakes High Population studies in the Mis and Stua lakes
V. ammodytes, A. horvathi R Monitoring of the species Medium Primary presence data. Project headed by a herpetologist
Golden eagle R Study on the golden eagle High
Birds of prey R Survey of birds of prey High
Owls R Study on the distribution and ecology of owls High
Birds, migratory R Study of migratory phenomena through the mountain passes and the Val Cordevole Medium
Birds, overwintering acquatic R Monitoring of overwintering aquatic birds Medium
Birds, farmland habitats R Monitoring of birds in farmland habitats Medium
Woodpeckers R Study of the distribution and ecology of the various species of woodpecker present in the Park High
Red deer R Habitat selection and impact of red deer on forest biodiversity High Development of a monitoring system and launch of a study on red deer-forest interactions (preferred environments, damage to vegetation)
Chamois R Epidemiology of mange and population dynamics of the chamois Maximum Epidemiology of mange and population dynamics of the chamois
Mink R Verification of the status of the mink Maximum Direct and indirect indicators of presence.
Fox R Analysis of the trophic spectrum of the fox Medium Standardised collection
Lynx R Monitoring of the lynx in the Park and neighbouring areas Maximum Monitoring project
Brown hare, mountain hare R Evaluation of environmental parameters High
Brown hare, mountain hare R Study of breeding success High
Chiroptera R Study of the ecological preferences of bat species in the Park and determination of the status of the populations. Medium

Legend
Type of action: M: Species management; S: Survey; EI: Environmental improvement;
Invertebrates
Fish
Amphibians
Reptiles
Birds
Mammals

A total of 84 proposals have been drawn up, divided as follows: 15 environmental improvement, 27 basic monitoring, 20 active species management and 22 research projects. Many of these are already underway or in an advanced stage of planning.

Geographical Information System
All data on Park wildlife has been entered in a database integrated in a Geographical Information System. This enables maps to be produced showing the current distribution of the various species and by integration with data already available on types of forest and herbaceous associations (deriving from the "Forestry" and "Grassland Improvement" special projects) will allow processing in the future with environmental suitability models.

Conclusions
The Animals Special Project has been designed to achieve two main objectives: to review the state of knowledge about species present in the Belluno Dolomites National Park and to identify a series of measures to be implemented in the future to facilitate conservation.
The approach of the entire project is aimed at considering the entire zoocenosis present as completely as possible, while being aware that social interest leans heavily towards the taxa traditionally easier to perceive and utilise directly.
The Animals Special Project has therefore also tried to tackle problems associated with groups of animals often neglected by planning (small mammals, bats, carnivores, etc) which in a protected area (but not only) should have "equal dignity" as the species traditionally studied.

Enrico Vettorazzo - Belluno Dolomites National Park

 

 

 

 

 

 

Carta qualità
  Regulations
  Companies
Sustainable holiday accommodation network
Agenda 21
LIFE - AgEMAS project
Cultivated biodiversity
Animals Special Project
The eagle in the eastern Alps
Reintroduction of the marmot
Safeguarding and monitoring of birds in the Park

Copyright © Parco Nazionale Dolomiti Bellunesi - info@dolomitipark.it - tel. +39-0439-3328 - fax +39-0439-332999 - Contacts - Credits